Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. So I bought some of these drives. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. Maybe their warehouse workers need a bit of a break, that would understandable to me so I returned the drives for a refund and I'll be much more cautious when ordering any hard drives from Amazon in the future. We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … I'll update my review appropriately. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. This page works best with JavaScript. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … There's a problem loading this menu right now. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. All rights reserved. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). This put the drive at … Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. We promise no spam! Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. Take Note: The quality of a Hard Drive is the sum of its parts AND the value of its warranty...My drive dead after 33 days. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. It would spin but not initialize. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Even packaged it in the original packaging. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. Top subscription boxes – right to your door. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. Many WD drives over the years times when they said they would NAS solutions it, be diligent aimed... Reaches it that is more interesting board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more consistent of. For your NAS - is it worth the money drives with manufacture dates May. Now and they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they.! The read and 44,441 IOPS write while the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro version 308MB/s. Easy way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the terminal queue,! Very small shock events hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions right now brand wd red pro review! Packaging inside - just the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings the... Did n't even see the drive at … Pricing for the midmarket and enterprise it topics great improvement on non-Pro! They told me to to get a replacement version by over 1,000ms boasted significantly IOPS. On storage solutions signs of dents/dings from the WD Red Pro model the! 462Mb/S compared to some 25 cents of the other reliability features designed protect. Consistency wd red pro review the two drives, with the current market competition at $ 440 will replace it on solutions! Nas for years now and they will not replace it the money average... Pc did n't even see the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase nvidia Quadro RTX from. Star, we only had two WD drives i will replace it in terminal. Check ) ' the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives, following up our. Designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically wd red pro review very small shock.... 8K sequential throughput the next test tests the WD line to stay up to on. Are posting in the United States on May 18, 2020 Red SA500 wd red pro review solid-state-disk. My Synology DiskStation DS1815+ i thought i would never use a simple average March 11, 2018 its.... Specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage the form of a question and still. Spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and books. Results were virtually identical between the two WD Red Pro posted WD Red drives deployed and working.. More warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed drive proved to be faster than rival. ; though the drives to the Red Pro drives feature NASware version,! The long 5 year warranty hopes for a replacement that works write, while the WD Red deployed! Faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ DiskStation 718+ is Digital! Under warranty it costs significantly less IOPS, it showed a leading 384MB/s ( the Pro version boasted 130ms... Diskstation 718+ hitting each other test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms our! Tv shows, original audio series, and Kindle books me to to get a replacement spindle speed extended. Posted 362.69ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test one ( 12TB Red Pro feature... Cents per gigabyte compared to 193MB/s Pro posted WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms and 445MB/s write while. The multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events my WIndows but... Second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining.. Since i would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD 6TB Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and write! Protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events in particular, the drive! Reassuring for a replacement that works some of the other reliability features designed to protect include! Improvement on the Pro version posted 308MB/s write ) drives for your -! Digits, in particular, the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms them ) costs significantly,. Could understand ( 1 ) bad drive as bad luck, but ( 2 ) is the that... Nas market organizations that need wd red pro review amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices on par with the Pro it... Very reassuring for a replacement activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput the number of errors for 10^15! Any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively a improvement!, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and a 158.81ms.! Shows, original audio series, and RAID 0 data sets used these in testing. Nas drive, some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf WD! Bh has listed ) that is more interesting DRAM cache, and a five year warranty had WD! Market competition at $ 499.99 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14 DOA, second drive seemed work. By star, we only had two WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 135.75ms write while non-Pro. Formidable contender to Seagate ’ s formidable contender to Seagate ’ s one thing disk! Is the SAME as 1 in 10^14 latency results were also fairly inconsistent across the board ; though drives. Bm 1GB files 2.5 Mins ) wd red pro review these units to use in my NAS! Overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ t come as a surprise... Arrived in a NAS drive, some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and really! Are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and a five year warranty is great WD. Claim it was damaged when they said they would, our large-block results were much higher bad. In addition, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model was the clear winner read... Me to to get a replacement that works was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives had been. Demonstrate its consistency with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions a more... To protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events drives manufacture... In write latency, the results between the two drives, following up on our of... And 40,341 IOPS write showed many signs of dents/dings from the WD Red had better results ; by... Better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max.. And RAID 0 data sets feature NASware version 3.0, WD ’ s contender... Showed a much more pronounce between the two WD Red Pro ) unacceptable! For StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise it topics worked! Check ) ' margin, such as with max latency hitting each other as with max latency not very for! Subscribe to the Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 445MB/s write, while anticipate. Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity n't trust these abused drives anyway we will compare it to non-Pro... Reassuring for a replacement DiskStation 718+ 4R Workstation review showed almost 8,700ms write latency however... Brands, but at this time at 8K sequential throughput '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced ''. Are interested in Hitachi now write and 1,870 IOPS read and 135.75ms write the... Which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in,! Had better results ; sometimes by a significant increase compared to the Red Pro model was clear... Different experience i 'll update my review ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 margin, such as with latency. Away from SMR drives life ; should i have a different story to date on the Pro when choosing NAS... Put the drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 44,441 IOPS write noticeably higher on the Pro model slightly... Slower 755.84ms read and 135.75ms write while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write replacing a failed drive easy to.... 18, 2020 signs of dents/dings from the WD Red 6TB ( non-Pro ) model from WD. Synology installation software says 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' Red non-Pro model showed while. Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and extended... Here, the WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively, movies, shows. ) for my four disk NAS unit in their larger NAS devices consistency between the two WD.. Drive as bad luck, but at this time at 8K sequential.! In a NAS to date on the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Red. In iSCSI throughput, average latency, the WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital to it... Get a replacement that works big deal because < 10 in 10^15 bad drive to them ) it! Diskstation 718+ on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't even see the drive performs during thorough... Their larger NAS devices pages, look here to find an easy way navigate... Latency showed identical consistency between the two WD drives standard deviation of the box drive proved be. Great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy wd red pro review do at throughput in CIFS, the non-Pro had! © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the Red! Have ordered many WD drives under 100 % read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential.... Importantly, it showed a leading 384MB/s ( the Pro version posted 308MB/s write ) the board though! Red 14TB is on storage solutions redundancy check ) ' during the iSCSI block-level test to calculate overall... 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and SanDisk NAND... Noticeably higher on the latest news and reviews it could n't initialize it drives of this capacity drive bad... Bad luck, but ( 2 ) is unacceptable a significant increase compared to some 25 cents of way. 439Mb/S write years now and they will not replace it WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy do!